If you’ve been following my blog then you should have a working understanding of what CBT is. (If not, check out this article before reading further.) I introduced you to CBT and discussed how it can help your clients better their lives and achieve their personal goals, but how does it stack up against other therapy techniques? Today I’m going to compare psychodynamic psychotherapy, which is based on psychoanalytic theory, and CBT, which is based on the cognitive and behavioral fields.
Psychodynamic Psychotherapy
We’re going to start by examining each form of therapy individually before comparing the two
As you know, Psychodynamic psychotherapy, like CBT, has been proven to work through research. It makes use of the psychoanalytical theory of Sigmund Freud and uses free association and the understanding of transference and counter-transference to help clients recognize why they’re having psychological issues and lead them down a cathartic path where they can then improve their status after realizing the root of their problem.
This therapy method tends to work well because it focuses on getting to root of the client’s problems and allows for a free range of corrections that account for the various idiosyncrasies you may notice during your sessions.
The challenge with psychodynamic psychotherapy – especially in today’s fast-paced society – is that it takes quite a while and is rather costly in order to be truly effective. Getting sensitive, helpful information from clients by getting them to talk about their childhood can be like pulling teeth. It’s also hard to test the therapy empirically since results are intrinsic to each particular individual, which makes its effectiveness a hotly debated topic.
CBT (Cognitive Behavioral Therapy)
CBT is seemingly the opposite of psychodynamic psychotherapy. It is goal-oriented, has a set time frame, and tends to be more structured – all pros in its corner. It also has a bit more scientific support and is much more cost effective than the former therapy type, which are big pluses in today’s economy.
CBT isn’t all roses and unicorns though. It can miss issues that are brought to light in more in-depth therapies like psychotherapy, which can greatly limited the overall effectiveness of CBT if those issues are left unaddressed. It tends not to be as effective for people with complex mental disorders or learning disabilities – limiting the population range CBT can benefit and causing you to have to turn away more clients if you choose to use only CBT.
The Final Comparison
CBT simply works better in today’s insurance reimbursement driven world. People are more skeptical of the psychodynamic approach than ever before and many simply aren’t willing to spend the money required to see real results from psychodynamic psychotherapy. You may it best to start with CBT, especially if there’s a specific issue the client wants addressed, and then ease into psychodynamic psychotherapy once the client has become acclimated with you and a working relationship and trust has been established.
